On July 6 I published a post on this Blog with the title:
"One Must Pity Maureen Dowd, She is Such a Miserably
That post was primarily a reproduction of a post by Scipio
on his Blog, TheReturnofScipio.blogspot.com, entitled:
"The Emptiness of Maureen Dowd."
I was prompted to publish that post because I have such strong feelings that the New York Times is the source of so much that is wrong in the thinking of left liberals in our society. Dowd is a prominent columnist for the NYT and has been for many years. In her own way she epitomizes what is wrong with the NYT.
I must confess that back my liberal youth I believed that the NYT was the absolute bible for "all the news that is fit to print" and though I could ill afford it I subscribed to the Sunday Edition by mail for years. As St. Paul says, when I was a child I played with the things of a child, but now that I am grown up I have put away childish things.
What brings to me back to the subject of the NYT and Maureen Dowd is the appearance today of an absolutely brilliant article by Jeffrey Lord on the Ameican Spectator website. His article is entitled:
"The Unbearable Whiteness of Being Maureen Dowd."
You can view it here:
It is the funniest, most serious expose of the hypocrisy of
the left-liberals you will ever read on the subject of
- Leo Rugiens
BARRY SOETORO aka BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
He is not eligible to be
President of the United States
because he is not a Natural Born Citizen
as required by Article Two, Section One, Clause Five of the United States Constitution.
This is a fact REGARDLESS of
where he was born (Mombassa, Hawaii, Chicago, Mecca or Mars).
He is not eligible
because he was not born of
BOTH OF WHOM WERE UNITED STATES CITIZENS
at the time of his birth as required by the Constitution.
His father was a subject/ciitizen
of Kenya/Great Britain at the time of his birth and afterwards.
The FACT that he was not born of TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS is all that matters. The question of his birth certificate is a distraction (a distraction fostered by Obama’s supporters?) that ought not to occupy our time and resources.
However, it is possible that he is not a United States
citizen at all even if he was born in Kenya, as three witnesses have testified. The reason is because his mother could not pass her US citizenship on to her son because she did not live continuously in the United States for five full years after her fourteenth birthday as required by the US immigration law in effect during that period of time.
Check it out:
Also, an excellent introductory primer on Obama Presiidential Eligibility is to be found at:
His usurpation can only be corrected (1) by Congress through his Impeachment and Removal [something which will never happen in a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid], or (2) it can be
corrected by his resignation, which could happen if the public presssure on him to resign becomes great enough, or (3) by his removal by the United States Supreme Court affirming a Quo Warranto decision of the United States Federal District Court for the District of Columbia [which process Attorney General Eric Holder would never allow to even begin] or (4) by an amendment to the Constitution,
which will never happen because that again would require the agreement of a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid.
HERE IS THE QUESTION WHICH EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD BE ASKING HIS OR HER CONGRESSMAN AND SENATORS
“During the 2008 election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was ‘governed’ by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell me, and the American people, how a person governed - at birth - by British law, can be a natural born citizen of the United States and thus constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States?”
- Leo Rugiens